Confronting my moral failures this Easter
At this time each year I hear the message of Easter at church: Jesus, who was God as a human being, willingly gave himself to be killed for our sake. This was to take the punishment for our sins. Three days later he rose from the dead. He later ascended into heaven, and we can follow after him in eternity. This year, I think about this message in the context of a world like ours today where morality is a hugely important conversation. I don't mean morality as in exclusive church-ey piety, which is definitely not a central conversation (but rather, unfortunately, the butt of jokes). I mean morality as in living justly and ensuring no one lives in injustice, and at the same time cultivating patience, kindness, generosity, and other virtues in myself.
On the matter of justice, the past year's enforced shutdown of normal life has given me more breath and attention to observe and respond, in what way I can, to grave, prolonged injustices around me. I think of police brutality, racial injustice, gender-based violence, and political abuse—all of which you can probably map onto international headlines you've seen yourself. The prosecution for George Floyd's death, for example, started a few days ago and has been dominating headlines.
I feel a strong moral pull to pursue justice, using my time, my voice, and my relationships to right wrongs and make peace. But I always feel an inner dissonance as a result of my failures to do enough: for my selfishness with my time, my fear of consequences, and my self-centered desire just to be seen as a good person rather than to be one regardless of an audience. I get this expression of "dissonance" from Augustine, who wrote that he lived in between two warring wills. One, a will to live a life bound to God, and two, a will to follow his personal impulses without being dictated by God. He wrote that in the dissonance between these two wills, his soul disintegrated. I identify with that, and I think that, to a measure, someone who doesn't have a will to be bound to God but has a will to somehow be good, will also feel some dissonance. We never measure up to who we think we ought to be.
This dissonance is haunting, and it doesn't quite go away just by being ignored. Always in me I feel this wrongness, of not being good enough in moral terms, wanting to be better, but being unable to. My many failures trail behind me at every step, and it sometimes feels like there's nothing I can do about them—that I just have to hear them rattle in my past as I bring them, ever amassing, into my future.
The Easter message reminds me that God's pattern from the beginning has been to heal and redeem our inevitable moral failures for us. Back in Abraham's time, God did not allow Abraham to kill his son Isaac as a sacrifice for his sins. Instead, he provided Abraham with a ram, which Abraham killed as a sacrifice instead. Abraham remembered that provision by the phrase Jehovah-Jireh, meaning God will provide (Genesis 22). This was God's pattern from the beginning. Eventually, by coming into the world in human form (as Jesus Christ), God completed the payment for our unjust lives forever, so that like Isaac, no one who holds to Jesus would have to pay the final price of our failures. He would sever the trailing failures from us for good.
The violence probably seems so unnecessary. Do failures have to demand a penalty, and a violent one? As Christian Wiman grappled with it, he called it a "perverse calculus" that God had to die in our place (though it's not clear what it was he found perverse about it). But really the need for a costly penalty is evident in our deep intuitions of justice. A picture that comes to mind is that of Edward Colston's statue being tumbled into the Bristol Harbour: a death sentence by drowning, an eternal damnation into our modern hell.
- We condemn figures of history and people of privilege, not just by dropping them from history but by subjecting them to ceremonial denunciation (ceremonial drowning, like Edward Colston's statue).
- At the same time we recognise more and more ways to use our positions to alleviate injustices and right wrong relationships, and these translate into more and more moral obligations.